BOINC 基准测试结果专用贴

colo

A64 3000+ 939

2005-8-15 21:56:50||Suspending computation and network activity - running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-15 21:56:52||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-15 21:57:49||Benchmark results:
2005-8-15 21:57:49||   Number of CPUs: 1
2005-8-15 21:57:49||   1631 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-8-15 21:57:49||   3025 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-8-15 21:57:49||Finished CPU benchmarks
2005-8-15 21:57:49||Resuming computation and network activity
2005-8-15 21:57:49||request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities

似乎分数低了点，相比前面2800+的

freestar8

引用 colo 在 2005-8-15 21:59 时的帖子:
A64 3000+ 939

2005-8-15 21:56:50||Suspending computation and network activity - running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-15 21:56:52||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-15 21:57:49||Benchmark results:
2005-8 ...

呵呵！不好意思！我的计算机超频了，忘了说了，超的不多一点点。
不过我的电压也调高过了，呵呵，合理配置了一下！：-）

Youth

呵呵,如果CPU进行了超频,也请详细说明,不然就没有可比性了:)

// 原文修改一下吧~~

szterry

最新成绩

[ Last edited by szterry on 2006-5-14 at 08:35 ]

Grё@thΙll

Microsoft Windows 2000
Professional Edition, Service Pack 4, (05.00.2195.00)
Memory 127.48 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Swap space 719.13 MB
Total disk space 4.46 GB
Free Disk Space 2.85 GB
Measured floating point speed 455.27 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 756.06 million ops/sec

Grё@thΙll

2005-8-16 14:02:02||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-16 14:02:59||Benchmark results:
2005-8-16 14:02:59||   Number of CPUs: 1
2005-8-16 14:02:59||   600 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-8-16 14:02:59||   1046 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-8-16 14:02:59||Finished CPU benchmarks
2005-8-16 14:02:59||Resuming computation and network activity
2005-8-16 14:02:59||request_reschedule_cpus: Resuming activities
2005-8-16 14:02:59|LHC@home|Restarting result wjun2D_v6s4hvpac_mqx__11__64.312_59.322__8_10__6__15_1_sixvf_boinc13953_2 using sixtrack version 4.67

colo

回去小超了一下A64 3000+ 939 1.8G @ 280X9=2520MHz

2005-8-17 6:41:18||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
2005-8-17 6:42:59||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-17 6:43:56||Benchmark results:
2005-8-17 6:43:56||   Number of CPUs: 1
2005-8-17 6:43:56||   2374 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-8-17 6:43:56||   4379 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-8-17 6:43:56||Finished CPU benchmarks

Youth

呵呵，效果很明显啊

Youth

晕,至少把CPU是什么说出来吧:)

引用 Grё@thΙll 在 2005-8-16 01:55 PM 时的帖子:
Microsoft Windows 2000
Professional Edition, Service Pack 4, (05.00.2195.00)
Memory 127.48 MB
Cache 976.56 KB
Swap space 719.13 MB
Total disk space 4.46 GB
Free Disk Space 2.85 GB
Mea ...

Grё@thΙll

哦sorry~  p3 700

szterry

回去小超了一下A64 3000+ 939 1.8G @ 280X9=2520MHz

2005-8-17 6:41:18||request_reschedule_cpus: process exited
2005-8-17 6:42:59||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-17 6:43:56||Benchmark results:
2005-8-17 6:43:56||   Number of CPUs: 1
2005-8-17 6:43:56||   2374 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-8-17 6:43:56||   4379 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-8-17 6:43:56||Finished CPU benchmarks

这样才对得起3000+，不过这不算小超了。

colo

引用 szterry 在 2005-8-17 10:07 时的帖子:

这样才对得起3000+，不过这不算小超了。

现在都流行E3 3000+默认电压风冷跑300X9——我加了0.25V才跑280X9，只能算是小超了，cpu体质不好

贴个P4 2.4无超线程的
2005-8-17 15:41:20||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-17 15:42:17||Benchmark results:
2005-8-17 15:42:17||   Number of CPUs: 1
2005-8-17 15:42:17||   1249 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-8-17 15:42:17||   2575 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-8-17 15:42:17||Finished CPU benchmarks

colo

P4 2.8关闭超线程的结果，居然连前面的P4 2.4都不如，我晕了，一定是哪里出了错……

2005-8-21 13:08:11||Running CPU benchmarks
2005-8-21 13:09:08||Benchmark results:
2005-8-21 13:09:08||   Number of CPUs: 1
2005-8-21 13:09:08||   1337 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2005-8-21 13:09:08||   2083 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2005-8-21 13:09:08||Finished CPU benchmarks

szterry

其实Benchmark的高低，对分数有影响吗？因为同一台机子，Benchmark的分数也有高和低。

Youth

有影响

另外,同一台机器
不修改设置的话
分数应该相对是比较固定的,偏差不大