找回密码
 新注册用户
搜索
查看: 4610|回复: 4

恭喜woweike同学发明永动机

[复制链接]
发表于 2010-8-18 02:07:17 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 6656990 于 2010-8-18 02:15 编辑

本坛的woweike同学,在某帖中教育我这小学生,说输入CPU的电能是全部转换成热能的,这就是说输入电能=热能,但CPU不是靠热能,而是电势能工作。所以输入电能<热能+电势能,即输入<输出,所以恭喜woweike同学发明永动机

另外呢,woweike同学非要说CPU工作温度上限是160度,安全温度100度,所以你居然拿那技嘉软件撑场面,你以为别人不知道这个软件?要不要我发个图上来,改成其他温度?  这种低级招数也使得出来

我让你看BIOS怎么哑巴了,你要不会看我告诉你吧,你的BIOS里CPU报警是60-90

还有OPN看了吗,你要不会就把你的贴出来我帮你看?

例子还在这
Opteron 240,OSA240CCO5AH;Athlon 64 FX-51,ADAFX51CEP5AK;Athlon 64 3200+: ADA3200AEP5AP
它们能承受的最高工作温度分别为:69℃、70℃、70℃。


最后,我跟你打赌呢,怎么怂的话都不敢接?

“不要把无知当成一种炫耀的资本
不是每个人都有空看你秀下限的”  搞笑,本坛居然有你这种人,SHOW下限,哈哈





另外,金鹏大版,此人先出言不逊且不学无术,我决定跟她打赌,一块i7 980呢
忘高抬贵手,你这次帮他,他还会骚扰别人
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-8-18 03:06:33 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 panzerkiller 于 2010-8-18 03:09 编辑

顶一下,关于CPU能量去了哪里wiki上有这么一段:
关键词: dissipation  损耗,transistors 晶体管,impedance 阻抗
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CPU_power_dissipation

Central processing unit power dissipation or CPU power dissipation is the process in which central processing units (CPUs) consume electrical energy, and dissipate this energy both by the action of the switching devices contained in the CPU (such as transistors  or vacuum tubes) and by the energy lost in the form of heat due to the impedance of the electronic circuits. Designing CPUs that perform these tasks efficiently without overheating  is a major consideration in nearly all CPU manufacturers to date.

Some implementations of CPUs use very little power, for example, the CPUs in mobile phones often use just a few hundred milliwatts of electricity. In comparison, CPUs in general purpose personal computers, such desktops and laptops, dissipate significantly more power because of their higher complexity and speed. These microelectronic CPUs may consume power in the order of tens of watts. Historically, early CPUs implemented with vacuum tubes consumed power in the order of many kilowatts.

CPUs for desktop computers typically use more power than any other component inside the computer, except perhaps recent video cards which contain graphics processing units. While energy-saving features have been instituted in personal computers for when they are idle, the overall consumption of today's high-drain CPUs is considerable. This is in strong contrast with the much lower energy consumption of CPUs designed for low-power environments. One such CPU, the Intel XScale, can run at 600 MHz with only half a watt of power, whereas x86 PC processors from Intel in the same performance bracket consume roughly eighty times as much energy.[citation needed]

There are some engineering reasons for this pattern.

    * For a given device, operating at a higher clock rate always requires more power. Reducing the clock rate of the microprocessor through power management when possible reduces energy consumption.
    * New features generally require more transistors, each of which uses power. Turning unused areas off saves energy, such as through clock gating.
    * As a processor model's design matures, smaller transistors, lower-voltage structures, and design experience may reduce energy consumption.

Processor manufacturers usually release two power consumption numbers for a CPU:

    * typical thermal power, which is measured under normal load.
    * maximum thermal power, which is measured under a worst-case load.

For example, the Pentium 4 2.8 GHz has 68.4 W typical thermal power and 85 W maximum thermal power. When the CPU is idle, it will draw far less than the typical thermal power.

Datasheets normally contain the thermal design power (TDP), which is the maximum amount of power the cooling system in a computer is required to dissipate. Both Intel and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) have defined TDP as the maximum power consumption for thermally significant periods running worst-case non-synthetic workloads. Thus, TDP is not the actual maximum power of the processor.
回复

使用道具 举报

头像被屏蔽
发表于 2010-8-18 08:52:50 | 显示全部楼层
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-8-18 09:22:36 | 显示全部楼层
怎么网站瘫痪了2天火药出来了?不明真相,大家都是无偿运算的兄弟和气为上。
金版可能了解情况,我先锁了主题。

评分

参与人数 1基本分 +18 收起 理由
金鹏 + 18 我很赞同

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2010-8-18 09:42:46 | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# 6656990

回复 3# woweike


兄弟们淡定!我是帮你们两位兄弟,为的是咱们大家有一个比较轻松的讨论环境,能有一个好的心情为公益努力计算。

每个人专长不同,看法各异,比如我就很缺乏专业知识,有时回帖闹出很多笑话,坛子里的兄弟们及时给我指出来后,我学到了很多知识,所以我认为我们讨论的目的一是交流,二是共同提高,三是增进算友凝聚力,兄弟们都自掏腰包买硬件付电费带着一颗公益心作出无私的贡献,没有必要计较几句话上的得失
   
支持两位兄弟各抒己见,但要有理有据,本着合理交流共同提高,把激情更多的投入到你们热爱的分布式计算上,尽量避免引起误会的用词

评分

参与人数 1基本分 +10 收起 理由
merlinl + 10 我很赞同

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 新注册用户

本版积分规则

论坛官方淘宝店开业啦~

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|中国分布式计算总站 ( 沪ICP备05042587号 )

GMT+8, 2025-5-16 14:38

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2024 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表