|
|
http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/forum_thread.php?id=6815
1 the average credit was reduced by 25% for S5R4 compared to S5R3 as announced.
2 the claimed credit is currently independent of the granted credit, and found to be much lower atm.
3 the workunits generated at first by the S5R4 workunit generator all at the upper end of the runtime variation for a given frequency band. They should average out over time, but at the beginning we got all "bad" ones.
1 平均来说，如之前我们所宣布的，S5R4的得分率相对S5R3调低了25%（译注：应该是和S5R3后期使用优化计算程序的情况相比较）
2 目前的申请积分和最终得分没有关系，而且前者现在的值非常低
3 S5R4目前的任务单元计算时间都偏长（译注：所以导致得分率的实际降低比例超过了25%），以后的任务单元计算时间平均来说会比较正常，但现在最早这批全是时间比较长的
I intend to fix 2 in the next few days, it's an unwanted side-effect of our efforts to fix the "duration correction factor". I hope to be able to fix 3 in a longer term in the workunit generator. For now I bumped up the credit (for newly generated workunits) manually by 15% (>= 13.9%) based on the following database queries (we gave 28% more credit than SETI at the end of S5R3):
接下来几天会把第2点先修正，这只是我们在修正DCF时产生的一个非预期结果；而第3点的修正要花更多时间，目前临时的处理方法把新生成的任务单元的积分提高15%，这个比例是根据目前的数据库查询结果而决定的。
We'll keep watching these numbers and adjust credits as needed.
以后还会根据情况对积分进行调整。 |
|
发表于 2008-8-7 22:14:26
发表于 2008-8-7 23:20:20
